Case studies · Large catalog

Client Asked to Increase Profitability. We Delivered $87K More and Reversed a Declining Trend.

This client came with one goal: increase profitability. Their numbers looked healthy on the surface, over $1.8M in quarterly sales, but the profit trend told a different story. Net profit was down 31.4% year-over-year in Q4. Ad spend was high, waste was buried in the campaigns, and every dollar of margin improvement required digging. We didn't just improve profitability. We reversed a declining trend and delivered more profit than the previous quarter, with less ad spend.

Large-Scale Seller · Profitability Turnaround · Q4 2025 → Q1 2026
Net Profit$697,575→ $784,952+$87K
Profit Trend (YoY)−31.4%→ +12.5%+43.9pp
Ad Cost$111,241→ $77,217−30.6%
Ad Waste SavedBuried→ $34K savedRecovered
Sales Scale$1.85M→ $1.68M QTDMaintained

The original screenshots

Amazon profitability case study – Performance chart: Sellerboard Profitability Dashboard: Q4 2025 vs Q1 2026
Performance chart: Sellerboard Profitability Dashboard: Q4 2025 vs Q1 2026

The challenge

This client came with one goal: increase profitability. Their numbers looked healthy on the surface, over $1.8M in quarterly sales, but the profit trend told a different story. Net profit was down 31.4% year-over-year in Q4. Ad spend was high, waste was buried in the campaigns, and every dollar of margin improvement required digging. We didn't just improve profitability. We reversed a declining trend and delivered more profit than the previous quarter, with less ad spend.

What we did

We started with a full ad account profitability audit — not just ACOS, but true profit impact per campaign, per SKU, per targeting type. Significant ad spend was being wasted on low-margin products and non-converting placements. We restructured budgets around the highest-margin SKUs, reduced spend on products where contribution margin didn't justify the ad investment, and tightened targeting across the board. The result: $34K less in ad cost, $87K more in net profit, and a profit trend that went from accelerating decline to clear growth.

Profitability AuditMargin-Based Budget AllocationSKU-Level ACOS TargetingAd Waste EliminationContribution Margin Analysis

Why it worked

Profit lives at the SKU level. Allocating budget by contribution margin instead of ACoS alone, and cutting spend on low-margin products and non-converting placements, reduced ad cost by $34K while net profit rose $87K and the year-over-year trend reversed.

Services behind this result

This result came from coordinated work across Account management, Amazon PPC. One team owned the whole channel, so changes to listings, ads and operations happened in the right order.

$100M+

revenue generated for client brands

60+

brands managed in-house

$3M+

monthly ad spend managed

4.4/5

on Trustpilot (13 reviews)

Questions about this case study

Is this a real client account?

Yes. Every figure on this page comes from the original Amazon screenshots shown, from an account CommerceKind manages. The client is not named to protect their confidentiality.

What services were involved?

Profitability Audit, Margin-Based Budget Allocation, SKU-Level ACOS Targeting, Ad Waste Elimination, Contribution Margin Analysis.

Will I get the same results?

Results depend on your product, margins, competition and starting point. We share a realistic plan after a free audit, not a guarantee.

How do I start?

Book a strategy call. We review your account and share a 90-day plan.

Want results like
these for your brand?

Book a strategy call and get a free audit with a clear 90-day plan.

Book a strategy call
Book a strategy call